Fitting Linear Models to Data

Supplement to Unit 9B

MATH 1001

 

In the handout we will learn how to find a linear model for data that is given and use it to make predictions.  We will also learn how to measure how closely the model “fits” the given data.  We will learn how to find the linear model that best fits a set of given data.

 

Finding a Linear Model for Data and Making Predictions

 

First, we consider the following table that gives the population for Spalding County, Georgia from 1960 to 2000.  (Source: U.S. Census Bureau)

 

Year

Pop. (thousand)

Change

1960

35.4

 

1970

39.5

4.1

1980

47.9

8.4

1990

54.5

6.6

2000

58.4

3.9

 

The third column of this table shows (for each decade year) the change in population during the preceding decade.  We see the population of Spalding County increased by about 4 thousand people in the 1950s and 1990s.  In the 1970s and 1980s the population increased by roughly 7 to 8 thousand people.  We might wonder whether this qualifies as almost linear population growth.  So, we will plot the data and look.  We plot the year on the x-axis and the population on the y-axis.

 

Figure 1

 

It appears from Figure 1 that these points do appear to lie on or near some straight line.  But, how can we find a straight line that passes through or near each data point?  One way is to simply pass a straight line through the first and the last data points.  To make this easier, we will let t be the number of years after 1960.  Thus, our data will look like:


 

t

(years since 1960)

P

(in thousands)

0

35.4

10

39.5

20

47.9

30

54.5

40

58.4

 

 

To find the slope between the first data point (0, 35.4) and the last data point (40, 58.4), we use the formula for the slope:

 

Note that the -intercept is (0, 35.4).  Thus, a linear model for the population of Spalding County is

P(t) = 0.575t + 35.4

 

The graph of this line and the data points is shown in Figure 2 below.  You can see that this line passes through or near each data point.

 

Figure 2

 

 

One of the reasons to find a model for real-world is to use the model to make predictions.  These predictions fall into two categories:  (1) making predictions within the scope of the data and (2) make predictions beyond the scope of the data.

 

As an example of the first type of prediction use the model we found for Spalding County population to predict the population for the year 1995.  Notice that 1995 is 35 years after 1960.  Thus, we substitute t = 35 into our equation:

 

P(35) = 0.575×35 + 35.4 ≈ 55.5

 

Thus, the population in Spalding County in 1995 was approximately 55.5 thousand people.

 

As an example of the second type of prediction use the model we found for Spalding County population to predict the population for the year 2010.  Notice that 2010 is 50 years after 1960.  Thus, we substitute t = 50 into our equation:

 

P(35) = 0.575×50 + 35.4 ≈ 64.2

Thus, the population in Spalding County in 2010 will be approximately 64.2 thousand people.

 

NOTE:  The farther predictions get from the ends of the data, the less reliable they become.  For example, using our model to prediction the population of Spalding County in 2040 would not give accurate results.

 

 

Measuring How Closely the Model Fits the Data

 

To measure how closely the model above fits the data, we begin by comparing the actual population values with the ones predicted by the model we found.  The error is the difference in the actual value and the predicted value; that is,

 

error = (actual value)  − (predicted value)

 

To get the predicted value, we substitute the values for t into our equation

P(t) = 0.575t + 35.4

 

            t = 0           P(0) = 0.575×0 + 35.4 = 35.4

            t = 10         P(10) = 0.575×10 + 35.4 = 41.15

            t = 20         P(20) = 0.575×20 + 35.4 = 46.9

            t = 30         P(30) = 0.575×30 + 35.4 = 52.65

            t = 40         P(40) = 0.575×40 + 35.4 = 58.4

 

 

t

P

(Actual)

P(t)

(Predicted)

Error, Ei

PP(t)

0

35.4

35.4

0

10

39.5

41.15

−1.65

20

47.9

46.9

1

30

54.5

52.65

1.85

40

58.4

58.4

0

 

 

The more useful way to measure how closely the model fits the data is by calculating the sum of the squares of errors and the average error.

 

Definition:  The phrase “Sum of Squares of Errors” is so common in data modeling that it is abbreviated SSE.  Thus, the SSE associated with data modeling based on n data points is defined by

 

 

To find the SSE we first begin by finding the squares of the errors.

 

 

t

P

(Actual)

P(t)

(Predicted)

Error, Ei

PP(t)

0

35.4

35.4

0

0

10

39.5

41.15

−1.65

2.7725

20

47.9

46.9

1

1

30

54.5

52.65

1.85

3.4225

40

58.4

58.4

0

0

 

Thus, the SSE is

 

 

The smaller the SSE is the better the model fits the data.  This allows you to compare two or more different models to determine which one is the best.

 

Another way to compare models is by finding the average error.

 

Definition:  The average error in a linear model fitting n given data points is defined by

 

 

 

The average error for our model is

 


Example: 

(a)   Find a linear model for the population of Spalding County using the first and fourth data points; that is, (0, 35.4) and (30, 54,5).

(b)   Use your model to predict the Spalding County population in the years 1995 and 2010.

(c)   Find the SSE and average error.  Use these to determine whether the model found in this example or the previous model is a better fit for the data.

 

(a)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b)


(c)

t

P

(Actual)

P(t)

(Predicted)

Error, Ei

PP(t)

0

35.4

 

 

 

10

39.5

 

 

 

20

47.9

 

 

 

30

54.5

 

 

 

40

58.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SSE =

 

 

 

average error =

 

 

 

Finding the Best-Fit Linear Model for Given Data

 

The big question is: how do we find the “best-fit” linear model for the data.  In short, we find it by finding a value for the slope of the line and the y-intercept that makes both the SSE and average error as small as possible.  Our calculators will find the best-fit linear model for us.  The steps are outlined below.

 

1.     Select STAT, 1:Edit….

2.     Enter the x-values for the data in L1 and the y-values in L2.

3.     Press STAT and arrow over to CALC.

4.     Select 4:LinReg(ax+b).

5.     Then enter L1 and L2 (or which ever lists you have your x- and y-values stored in).

6.     Press L1,L2.

7.     Press ENTER.

 


Example:

(a)   Find the best-fit linear model for the population data for Spalding County.

(b)   Use your model to predict the population in 1995 and 2010.

(c)   Find the SSE and the average error for the model.

 

(a)   P(t) = 0.61t + 34.94

(b)   P(35) = 0.61×35 + 34.94 ≈ 56.3 thousand

        P(50) = 0.61×50 + 34.94 ≈ 65.4 thousand

The population of Spalding County was about 56.3 thousand in 1995 and will be about 65.4 thousand in 2010.

(c)  

t

P

(Actual)

P(t)

(Predicted)

Error, Ei

PP(t)

0

35.4

34.94

0.46

0.2116

10

39.5

41.04

−1.54

2.3716

20

47.9

47.14

0.76

0.5776

30

54.5

53.24

1.26

1.5876

40

58.4

59.34

−0.94

0.8836

 

SSE = 0.2116 + 2.3716 + 0.5776 + 105876 + 0.8836 = 5.632

 

average error =

 

 

Exercises:

 

In each of problems 1 and 2 the population census data for a U.S. city is given.

(a)     Find a linear model for the data using the first and last data points.  Let t = 0 in the year 1950.  Use it to predict the population in 2000.  Calculate the average error of the model. 

(b)     Find the linear model that best fits this census data.  Let t be 0 in the year 1950. Use it to predict the population in 2000.  Calculate the average error of the model.

 

1.      San Diego, California:

 

Year

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Pop. (thous)

334

573

697

876

1111

 

 

2.      Riverside, California:

 

Year

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Pop. (thous)

47

84

140

171

227

 

 

In each of problems 3 and 4 the population census data for a U.S. city is given.

(a)     Find a linear model for the data using the second and fourth data points.  Let t = 0 in the year 1950.  Use it to predict the population in 2000.  Calculate the average error of the model. 

(b)     Find the linear model that best fits this census data.  Let t be 0 in the year 1950. Use it to predict the population in 2000.  Calculate the average error of the model.

 

3.      Garland, Texas:

 

Year

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Pop. (thous)

11

39

81

139

181

 

 

4.      Santa Anna, California:

 

Year

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Pop. (thous)

46

100

156

204

294

 

 

5.      The following table gives the number of compact discs (in millions) sold in the United States for the even-numbered years 1988 through 1996.

 

Year

1988

1990

1992

1994

1996

Sales, S, (millions)

149.7

286.5

407.5

662.1

778.9

         Source:  The World Almanac and Book of Facts 1998.

 

         (a)     Find the linear model S(t) = mt + b that best fits this data.  Let t = 0 in 1988.

         (b)     Compare the model’s prediction for the year 1995 with the actual 1995 CD sales of 722.9 million.

         (c)     Use the model to predict the CD sales for the year 2002.

         (d)     Which prediction, the one for 1995 or the one from 2002, is likely to be closer to actual sales?  Why?

 

 

6.      The table below lists the number of passenger cars (in millions) in the United States for the years 1940 through 1990.

 

Year

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

Number of Cars, N, (millions)

27.5

40.3

61.7

89.3

121.6

133.7

         Source:  Statistical Abstracts of the United States.

 

         (a)     Find the best-fit linear model for the data.  Let t = 0 in 1940.

         (b)     Use your model to predict the number of passenger cars in the year 2000 and in the year 2010.


Thus far we have constructed linear models for data that represent a function of some independent variable.  Frequently in the real world, we are confronted with data that does not actually describe a function, but that suggests a correlation that might be modeled by a liner function.  (For more information on correlation, review Unit 5E.)  Exercises 7 and 8 are examples of such data.

 

7.      In a 1977 study of 21 of the best American female runners, researchers measured the average stride rate, S, at different speeds, v.  The data are given in the table below.

 

Speed in ft/sec,